View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Cycreim Great Tree Officer


Joined: 22 Dec 2003 Posts: 1274 Location: Toronto, ON
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How much money would that end up being? About $1000? _________________ KI: 34353 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Saxy Community Orchestrator


Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 1272 Location: Under the New Mexico desert
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marten wrote: | Any word from GD? |
Not yet. I know he's a busy guy, but I've been trying to catch him on MSN Messenger to get some idea from him. No luck yet.
Marten wrote: | At this time I'm rounding my estimate of 25 people down to about 10. It might go back up. Officially, I cannot comment on why I am changing my estimate. |
That's definitely doable, especially if its only ten people. I think the upgrade retails for $100, but if I can a friend that works at Microsoft to buy them in the company store, we might be able to buy them for as low as $20. Don't quote me on that.
Thanks for not posting anything about this in other forums. I almost did on UO but thought better until we hear back from GD. _________________
Not all who wander are lost... (MJ fixed my sig!)
KI: 38931 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Saxy Community Orchestrator


Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 1272 Location: Under the New Mexico desert
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm trying to get a feel for what online fundraisers are like, so I found a website like this one. I haven't read it all yet, but I think it's a good synopsis.
I've also made a friends-only post on my LiveJournal asking my Microsoft-employed friends about the logistics of purchasing Windows XP upgrades through the Microsoft Employee Store. More details to come.
Does anyone know of free fundraiser hosting on the internet? I'm sure there are some sources out there that will host fundraisers for free... _________________
Not all who wander are lost... (MJ fixed my sig!)
KI: 38931 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Eleri Great Tree Member


Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 819
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
just FYI, GD is on vacation for a couple weeks. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Saxy Community Orchestrator


Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 1272 Location: Under the New Mexico desert
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doh, I completely forgot about that.  _________________
Not all who wander are lost... (MJ fixed my sig!)
KI: 38931 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Durin Mephit Great Tree Officer


Joined: 29 Jan 2004 Posts: 3119 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hm. Didn't realize it was several weeks. Thought he might be back by now.
If I see another effort take definite root before ours, I'll let you know Saxy. I know this is being talked about in other places, but nothing seems to be definitive anywhere yet. _________________ Durin Mephit * Member of Guild of Messengers - Unless otherwise stated, opinions are mine only and not Guild endorsed.
rel.to | Marten KI: 59474 | Durin M KI: 11883768 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
brian Fearless Leader


Joined: 24 Jun 2003 Posts: 1372 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm all for this, especially since it really only concerns 10 people. However, I'd like to be careful about this.
I really am a bit uncomfortable with the idea of getting this site involved in any organized charity efforts. The reason is because once you start dealing with real life charity in this kind of setting, it starts to get a little bit sticky. I'm not really sure what the political issues (if any) are around this issue, however would it look bad for us to donate a large amount of money to this kind of cause? Wouldn't some think it might be better for us to donate that money to another kind of charity? Would this sort of thing then obligate us to begin giving to other charities? Who decides what charities to give to? Do we need to appoint someone with the responsibility of researching charities to donate to?
Let's just think about the implications of doing this as a group. I'd like to see people go ahead with this, but I'm concerned about involving the actual group officially.
If you guys think I'm wrong about this, that's ok. I just wanted to express my concerns. _________________ #Brian Fioca
#KI: 11882331
#KI: 1504111 [disconnected]
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
brian Fearless Leader


Joined: 24 Jun 2003 Posts: 1372 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's another issue: Windows 2000 isn't a gaming OS. It was designed for corporate users as an upgrade to Windows NT 4.0 and any ability for it to run games is strictly a bonus. I personally don't think it's realistic to expect Cyan to support a 7 year old OS that was never designed to run games, and I'll stand by that. If we do anything, I want Cyan to make sure that we're not criticizing them on this. _________________ #Brian Fioca
#KI: 11882331
#KI: 1504111 [disconnected]
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Durin Mephit Great Tree Officer


Joined: 29 Jan 2004 Posts: 3119 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Brian,
I agree with everything above. It is odd that these folks are running W2K and trying to run games on it... but understanding the steaming loads of crap that MS sold as operating systems from Windows 95 through ME, I am willing to cut them some slack; 2K was much better than any of those OSes. XP didn't come out until 2001.
My suggestion is not for the group to donate money, but merely for some person to host and run the donation drive. I mentioned that The Great Tree is great about tearing down barriers, but I guess I wasn't clear that I wasn't suggesting our group affiliate directly with it.
Also, though some people such as myself have said we'd be willing to donate money towards such a cause, that is ultimately a decision for each individual to make (whether this is a worthy cause, or whether it would make sense to donate to some other charity). _________________ Durin Mephit * Member of Guild of Messengers - Unless otherwise stated, opinions are mine only and not Guild endorsed.
rel.to | Marten KI: 59474 | Durin M KI: 11883768 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Eleri Great Tree Member


Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 819
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think if you take it from the context of 'charity', and aproach it as 'group of enthusiasts buying XP in bulk so others can join us' then it becomes much less sticky. There's nothing that says a bunch of people can't buy software, and then gift it to whomever. _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
brian Fearless Leader


Joined: 24 Jun 2003 Posts: 1372 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good points. I suggest we stay away from calling it charity. I'm sure the people who would benefit from this might prefer it that way as well. _________________ #Brian Fioca
#KI: 11882331
#KI: 1504111 [disconnected]
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
janaba1 Great Tree Member


Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 1639 Location: berlin, germany
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very good and constructive thoughts and actions.
I feel we have a better foundation for this project now...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Saxy Community Orchestrator


Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 1272 Location: Under the New Mexico desert
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Brian does bring up a few concerns I had while thinking about this project over the previous days. My main concern was what people might think about donating a lot of time and effort to this project and not... solving world hunger. I think it's stupid if someone were to criticize us for focusing our "charity" on buying Windows upgrades for ten individuals, but I wouldn't put it past the general public.
I'm ambivalent about whether the project is associated with the Great Tree or not.
Regarding the issue of calling it a "charity," I personally don't care what the recipients of the fund drive think of "us" calling it such.
Webster's online dictionary's definition of 'charity' wrote: |
1 : benevolent goodwill toward or love of humanity
2 a : generosity and helpfulness especially toward the needy or suffering; also : aid given to those in need b : an institution engaged in relief of the poor c : public provision for the relief of the needy
3 a : a gift for public benevolent purposes b : an institution (as a hospital) founded by such a gift
4 : lenient judgment of others |
I can see how one or two of those definitions could be offensive to the people who would benefit from this drive, but I feel that the majority of the definitions fit this situation, particularly (1) and (3a). They are people in need, right? If they get offended by being the beneficiaries of a "charity project," then I suggest they make more of a creative and legal effort to acquire Windows XP themselves. If they can't recognize it as charity (goodwill, a gift from the love of the community), then maybe they don't need it. That was harsh, but I have issues with people who look a gift horse in the mouth. _________________
Not all who wander are lost... (MJ fixed my sig!)
KI: 38931 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Durin Mephit Great Tree Officer


Joined: 29 Jan 2004 Posts: 3119 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All the same, Saxy, the observation that "charity" is a loaded word is accurate. While the techy, geeky, introverted side of me says "Call a horse a horse," I decided to rename this discussion.
And for now, I propose that we table this talk until Tuesday or Wednesday. _________________ Durin Mephit * Member of Guild of Messengers - Unless otherwise stated, opinions are mine only and not Guild endorsed.
rel.to | Marten KI: 59474 | Durin M KI: 11883768 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
janaba1 Great Tree Member


Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 1639 Location: berlin, germany
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Saxy and everybody,
Saxy wrote: | …My main concern was what people might think about donating a lot of time and effort to this project and not... solving world hunger. I think it's stupid if someone were to criticize us for focusing our "charity" on buying Windows upgrades for ten individuals… |
This is correct, Saxy, no one will criticize us for that… We are “not” responsible for
“solving world hunger”, cause we cannot… this is impossible and nobody will expect
that. We belong to a community and as in any other community everybody feels
more or less responsible for each other and/or the whole thing… It is more than
natural to spend a lot of time and effort in whatever project within this community
as we all try to do it all the time…
If anybody wants to be a good person, he/she should do and give the best he/she
can wherever he/she is… at the workplace, within the family or any community,
with friends etc… There are more or less responsibilities, but nobody can and will
be kept responsible for more than that…
When I said, “very good and constructive thoughts and actions” and that we have
a better base now, I didn’t agree with all that’s been said, I just accepted the ideas
that had been stated. Changing the declaration of this project was a good compromise
to approach everybody’s view of the situation…
Saxy wrote: | …If they get offended by being the beneficiaries of a "charity project," then I suggest they make more of a creative and legal effort to acquire Windows XP themselves. If they can't recognize it as charity… |
I think, this was just a guess. I don’t believe anybody being benefit by the project
will have problems to recognize it as charity…
When I read through that all, I suddenly felt the project and the wonderful energy
behind it somewhat killed… so I felt the need to reopen some doors if possible…
But anyway, I am still so happy about the fact that there is a discussion like that with
everybody trying to give its best and to be open to the concerns of our community…
Still love you all for that…
Jana
Edit: Sorry Marten, wanted to post my opinion to that |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|